In a boost to protection of consumer rights,Bombay High Court last week observed that penalty of imprisonment or fine for non-compliance with the consumer forums directive was applicable to interim orders and not just final orders. In matters pertaining to consumer protection, law must be interpreted in favour of the consumer, said the court. Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act states that any person or trader who fails to comply with any order given by the District Forum, State Commission or National Commission, will be imprisoned for a term not less than a month or fined up to Rs 2,000. Stating that Section 27 makes no distinction between an interim and final order, a division bench of Justice Ferdino I Rebello and Justice J H Bhatia said, To give protection to the consumer and to make the execution of orders effective and less expensive,which is the object of Act,and to provide for speedy justice, we see no reason why the provisions contained in Section 27 should be restricted only to final orders.
====================
(source-toi)
The idea behind this blog is to educate/help/enlighten and not to create controversy or to incite. The opinions and views expressed on this blog are purely personal. Please be soft in your language, respect Copyrights and provide credits/links wherever possible.The blog team indemnifies itself of any legal issues that may arise out of any information/ views posted by anyone on the blog.
KIND ATTENTION - ALL BLOGGERS
DEAR FRIENDS, FROM 4.3.10 NIGHT, SOMEONE(SCOTLAND ADDRESS)HACKED MY E-MAIL gavinivn@gmail.com AND BEEN MIS-USING FOR WRONGFUL FINANCIAL GAIN. PLEASE DO NOT BELIEVE ANY STORY FROM THIS E-MAIL, IMPERSONATED BY HACKER IN THE NAME, GAVINI VENKATA NARAYANA, SEEKING FOR ANY HELP FINANCIAL OR OTHERWISE. THANKS.
No comments:
Post a Comment